BriefPulse Science · Research reporting with methods and limits kept visible. RSS · BriefPulse network
BriefPulse Science

Findings, methods and limits explained with the evidence in view.

16 September 2026

Brief

Luminescence dating pushes Mammoth Site age back more than 100,000 years

New dates published in Quaternary Research suggest the mammoths found in a South Dakota sinkhole were more than 160,000 years old, not roughly 26,000 years old as long accepted.

Mammoth Site Hot Springs
Photograph — Mammoth Site Hot Springs: Jeff the quiet · CC0 source

The Mammoth Site in South Dakota holds remains of dozens of mammoths that died in an ancient sinkhole. Their deaths had long been accepted as occurring roughly 26,000 years ago.

Luminescence dating now suggests the ice-age giants were more than 160,000 years old, according to dates published in Quaternary Research. The finding shifts the timeline by more than 100,000 years.

Our reading

Our reading is that the report gives the revised age but not the dating methods or uncertainty estimates, so how firmly the new figure is pinned down remains unclear.

What to do or watch

Watch for the Quaternary Research paper's dating methods and uncertainty estimates, because the supplied report gives the revised age but not how firmly the new figure is pinned down. The unresolved question is whether the more-than-160,000-year date will stand once those details are available.

Source details and supporting facts

Each line is stated by the page named above it.

Stated by phys.org

  • Deep within an ancient sinkhole lie the remains of dozens of mammoths
  • These deaths had long been accepted as having occurred roughly 26,000 years ago
  • New dates published in the journal Quaternary Research suggest these ice-age giants were more than 160,000 years old

Sources

  1. Phys.orgText stored 14 September 2026

How this story was checked. Written from the 1 page listed above, stored 14 September 2026; claims checked against that stored text on 14 September 2026.

What that means
  • 3 of 3 reported statements were confirmed against the page that carries them; the rest were removed rather than published.
  • Figures in the text were required to appear in the stored source text: yes. Identifiers: yes.
  • The check reads stored text only: no claim rests on a fresh look that did not happen.
  • Where the reporting was silent, the text says so instead of filling the gap.

More from Science